Einer meiner Kunden hat mich gebeten, Metriken zu vergleichen, damit ich diese Tabelle erstellen kann.
Grüße, Kapern Jones
| Funktionspunkte | Zeilen von Code | Story Points | Use-Case Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | Code | Points | Points | |
| ISO-Standard? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| OMG standard? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Professional associations? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Formal training? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Certification exam? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Automated counting? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Required by governments? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Good for productivity? | Ja | Nein | Ja | Nein |
| Good for quality? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Good for estimates? | Ja | Nein | Ja | Nein |
| Published conversion rules? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Accepted by benchmark groups? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Used for IT projects? | Ja | Ja | Ja | Ja |
| Used for web projects? | Ja | Ja | Ja | Ja |
| Used for cloud projects? | Ja | Ja | Ja | Nein |
| Used for embedded projects? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Used for systems software? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Used for telecom software? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Used for defense software? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Productivity Measures | ||||
| Activity-based costs? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Requirements productivity? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Design productivity? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Coding productivity? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Testing productivity? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Quality assurance productivity? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Technical writer productivity? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Project management productivity? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Net productivity of projects | Ja | Ja | Ja | Ja |
| Quality Measures | ||||
| Requirements defects? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Architecture defects? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Design defects? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Document defects? | Ja | Nein | Nein | Nein |
| Coding defects? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Bad fix defects? | Ja | Ja | Nein | Nein |
| Net quality of projects? | Ja | Ja | Ja | Ja |
| Annual rate of change in usage? | 20% | -15% | 15% | -5% |
| US-. usage - companies | 2500 | 2000 | 2500 | 500 |
| US-. usage - current projects | 30000 | 20000 | 15000 | 1000 |
| US-. usage - benchmarks | 90000 | 10000 | 5000 | 1500 |
| Global usage - companies | 4500 | 3700 | 4000 | 400 |
| Global usage - current projects | 65000 | 30000 | 15000 | 600 |
| Global usage - benchmarks | 150000 | 15000 | 5000 | 1500 |
| TOTAL USAGE - COMPANIES | 7000 | 5700 | 6500 | 900 |
| TOTAL USAGE - PROJECTS | 95000 | 50000 | 30000 | 1600 |
| TOTAL USAGE - BENCHMARKS | 240000 | 25000 | 10000 | 3000 |
| Major benefits | Genauigkeit | Easy to use | Agil | IBM origins |
| Economics | metric | |||
| Qualität | ||||
| Produktivität | ||||
| IBM origins | ||||
| Benchmarks | ||||
| Major problems | Slow | Inaccurate | Inaccurate | Inaccurate |
| Expensive | Varies by > 500% | Varies by > 400% | Varies by > 200% | |
| Penalizes high-level languages | Only works with User Stories | Only works with Use Cases | ||
| Government mandates contracts? | Brasilien Italien Japan Malaysia Südkorea | none | none | none |
| Major benchmark groups | BESETZUNG COSMIC DCG FISMA Galorath Gartner Metrisch IFPUG ISBSG JFPUG Level 4 Malaysian Test Metricas Metri Group Namcook Nesma QPMG QSM Reifer SPR Total Metrics | US Air Force Preissysteme Reifer | Construx | Metrisch (intern) |
Über den Autor:
Kapern Jones ist CTO von Namcook Analytics, Ein Unternehmen, das ein fortgeschrittenes Risiko aufbaut, Qualität, und Tools zur Kostenschätzung. Dieser Blogpost wurde ursprünglich im Namcook Analytics-Blog veröffentlicht.